Souza v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Souza v. Oregon State Penitentiary

754 P.2d 34, 91 Or. App. 168

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 11, 1988

Docket08-87-206; CA A45727

StatusPublished

This text of 754 P.2d 34 (Souza v. Oregon State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Souza v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 754 P.2d 34, 91 Or. App. 168 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary which found him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting possession of narcotics. He contends that there was not sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty and that the fine imposed was not authorized. There is sufficient evidence to support the finding. However, the fine is invalid. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary which found him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting possession of narcotics. He contends that there was not sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty and that the fine imposed was not authorized. There is sufficient evidence to support the finding. However, the fine is invalid. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

754 P.2d 34, 91 Or. App. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/souza-v-oregon-state-penitentiary-orctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack