Souza v. NI Holdings, LLC

252 So. 3d 382
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 1, 2018·No. No. 3D18-67·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So.3d 385, 389 (Fla. 2015) (holding that if the return of service is regular on its face, service of process is presumed to be valid, *383and the party challenging service has the burden of overcoming that presumption by clear and convincing evidence); Robles-Martinez v. Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP, 88 So.3d 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (same).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Souza v. NI Holdings, LLC, 252 So. 3d 382 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

252 So. 3d 382 (Souza v. NI Holdings, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lance Koster v. Carol Sullivan
160 So. 3d 385 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2015)
Robles-Martinez v. Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP
88 So. 3d 177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)