Home/Supreme Court of Rhode Island/Souza v. Mullen

Souza v. Mullen

359 A.2d 359, 116 R.I. 942, 1976 R.I. LEXIS 1502
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided June 10, 1976·No. M. P. No. 76-229·Published

Opinion

Respondent is directed to file his answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus for the purpose of bail and therein to shoiv cause, if any he has, why petitioner should not be admitted to bail, said answer to be made in compliance with [943]*943the provisions of Rule 14,

William J. Burke, for petitioner. Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Souza v. Mullen, 359 A.2d 359, 116 R.I. 942, 1976 R.I. LEXIS 1502 (R.I. 1976).

359 A.2d 359 (Souza v. Mullen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.