Souza v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

302 F. Supp. 3d 478
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMarch 30, 2018
DocketCIVIL ACTION NO. 15–13109–RWZ
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 302 F. Supp. 3d 478 (Souza v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Souza v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 302 F. Supp. 3d 478 (D.D.C. 2018).

Opinion

RYA W. ZOBEL, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendants moved to dismiss Counts III, V, and the punitive damages claim in Count IV (Docket # 78) of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, and renewed their motion (Docket # 93) as to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint.1 The Massachusetts wrongful death statute, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 229, § 2, provides for a single action brought by a decedent's executor or administrator2 encompassing loss *479of consortium and punitive damages. See Cox v. Brand 44, LLC, No. 15-cv-11903, 2015 WL 6182469 at *2 (D. Mass. Oct. 21, 2015), and cases cited. Although plaintiffs are free to seek such damages in connection with the wrongful death alleged in Count IV, neither can stand alone as a separate count. Accordingly, defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts III and V (Docket # 93) is ALLOWED, and its previous Motion to Dismiss the same counts of plaintiff's earlier complaint (Docket # 78) and Motion for Leave to File a reply brief (Docket # 81) are DENIED AS MOOT.

Defendants' Motion is DENIED as to the claim for punitive damages included in Count IV, which plaintiff has sufficiently pleaded and is entitled to develop in discovery.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 F. Supp. 3d 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/souza-v-colgate-palmolive-co-dcd-2018.