Souveran Fabrics Corp. v. Virginia Fibre Corp.

32 A.D.2d 753, 301 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3775
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 10, 1969·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order entered August 1, 1968, reversed on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with $30 costs and disbursements- to the appellant, and motion to vacate the demand for .bill of -particulars granted. Defendant should not .be required to detail in a bill of particulars the statutes and decisional law upon which it relies. (See Gevinson v. Kirkeby-Natus Corp., 26 A D 2d 71) Since the court is required to take judicial notice of ¡the law of New York without evidence to establish it (Richardson, Evidence [9th ed.], § 7) the defendant need not particularize the provisions of such law. Concur—Capozzoli, J. P., Tilzer, ■Markewich,.Nunez and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Souveran Fabrics Corp. v. Virginia Fibre Corp., 32 A.D.2d 753, 301 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

32 A.D.2d 753 (Souveran Fabrics Corp. v. Virginia Fibre Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Langella v. D'Agostino Supermarket, Inc.
122 Misc. 2d 708 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
Rippe v. City of Rochester
57 A.D.2d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)