Southworth v. County of Oswego
This text of 252 A.D. 916 (Southworth v. County of Oswego) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We put our affirmance on the broad principle that when the county became responsible for the maintenance of this road after its improvement, its responsibility included the entire width of the highway and the sidewalk as existing. AJI concur. (The order denies a motion to dismiss the complaint in a negligence action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 916, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southworth-v-county-of-oswego-nyappdiv-1937.