Southworth v. County of Oswego

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Southworth v. County of Oswego

252 A.D. 916, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6785

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 5, 1937·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We put our affirmance on the broad principle that when the county became responsible for the maintenance of this road after its improvement, its responsibility included the entire width of the highway and the sidewalk as existing. AJI concur. (The order denies a motion to dismiss the complaint in a negligence action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We put our affirmance on the broad principle that when the county became responsible for the maintenance of this road after its improvement, its responsibility included the entire width of the highway and the sidewalk as existing. AJI concur. (The order denies a motion to dismiss the complaint in a negligence action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Southworth v. County of Oswego, 252 A.D. 916, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

252 A.D. 916 (Southworth v. County of Oswego) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.