Southwestern Bell Yellow Pages v. Gerald Gruska, Inc.
This text of 986 S.W.2d 519 (Southwestern Bell Yellow Pages v. Gerald Gruska, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Gerald Gruska, Jr., d/b/a Quality Auto, Inc., appeals the trial court’s judgment nunc pro tunc changing its name from Gerald Gruska, Inc., d/b/a Quality Auto, Inc., to Gerald Gruska, Jr., d/b/a Quality Auto, Inc. We find that the trial court’s nunc pro tunc order is supported by the record. Brunton v. Floyd Withers, Inc., 716 S.W.2d 823 (Mo.App. E.D.1986).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
986 S.W.2d 519, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southwestern-bell-yellow-pages-v-gerald-gruska-inc-moctapp-1999.