Southwestern Bell Yellow Pages v. Gerald Gruska, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Southwestern Bell Yellow Pages v. Gerald Gruska, Inc.

986 S.W.2d 519, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 201

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 1999·No. No. 74310·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gerald Gruska, Jr., d/b/a Quality Auto, Inc., appeals the trial court’s judgment nunc pro tunc changing its name from Gerald Gruska, Inc., d/b/a Quality Auto, Inc., to Gerald Gruska, Jr., d/b/a Quality Auto, Inc. We find that the trial court’s nunc pro tunc order is supported by the record. Brunton v. Floyd Withers, Inc., 716 S.W.2d 823 (Mo.App. E.D.1986).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gerald Gruska, Jr., d/b/a Quality Auto, Inc., appeals the trial court’s judgment nunc pro tunc changing its name from Gerald Gruska, Inc., d/b/a Quality Auto, Inc., to Gerald Gruska, Jr., d/b/a Quality Auto, Inc. We find that the trial court’s nunc pro tunc order is supported by the record. Brunton v. Floyd Withers, Inc., 716 S.W.2d 823 (Mo.App. E.D.1986).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Southwestern Bell Yellow Pages v. Gerald Gruska, Inc., 986 S.W.2d 519, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 201 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

986 S.W.2d 519 (Southwestern Bell Yellow Pages v. Gerald Gruska, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related