Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Lee
311 U.S. 609, 61 S. Ct. 42
Opinion
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. Godchaux v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443.
[610] Reported below: 200 Ark. 318; 140 S. W. 2d 132.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Lee, 311 U.S. 609, 61 S. Ct. 42 (1940).
311 U.S. 609 (Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal
251 U.S. 179 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
261 U.S. 114 (Supreme Court, 1923)
Herndon v. Georgia
295 U.S. 441 (Supreme Court, 1935)
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Lee and Hanna
140 S.W.2d 132 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1940)