Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DIZDAR BROTHERS SEWER & CONSTRUCTION CO.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DIZDAR BROTHERS SEWER & CONSTRUCTION CO.

177 S.W.3d 857, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1710, 2005 WL 3112781

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 2005·No. ED 85606·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment in plaintiffs favor for damage to an underground telephone cable. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a written memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment in plaintiffs favor for damage to an underground telephone cable. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a written memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DIZDAR BROTHERS SEWER & CONSTRUCTION CO., 177 S.W.3d 857, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1710, 2005 WL 3112781 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

177 S.W.3d 857 (Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DIZDAR BROTHERS SEWER & CONSTRUCTION CO.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related