Southwest Georgia Development Co. v. Griffin

143 S.E. 784, 38 Ga. App. 276, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 190
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1928·No. 18430·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

1. The jury having found in favor of the defendant generally, and having thus necessarily adjudged, as they were authorized to do, that the plaintiff took over the timber and resold it to a third person during the period that the lease to the defendant had been extended, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover the agreed advance [277]*277payment as a penalty or forfeiture; nor, in view of such finding for the defendant, could the plaintiff have been harmed by any error in the charge of the court as to the measure of damages. Civil Code (1910), §§ 4390, 4391; Conant v. Jones, 120 Ga. 568 (12) (48 S. E. 234); Carstarphen v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co., 8 Ga. App. 162, 164 (68 S. E. 848); Sarman v. Seaboard Air-Line Ry. Co., 33 Ga. App. 315, 324 (125 S. E. 891).

Decided June 15, 1928. E. L. Smith, for plaintiff.

2. The court did not err in overruling the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southwest Georgia Development Co. v. Griffin, 143 S.E. 784, 38 Ga. App. 276, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 190 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

143 S.E. 784 (Southwest Georgia Development Co. v. Griffin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Noland v. England
113 S.E.2d 649 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Ludwig v. J. J. Newberry Company
52 S.E.2d 485 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Roddy v. Stansbury
165 S.E. 764 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Donaldson v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
159 S.E. 738 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)