Southland Loan & Investment Co. v. Truelove

138 S.E. 336, 36 Ga. App. 750, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 282
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 11, 1927·No. 17844·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

Under the decision of this court in East River National Bank v. Ellman, 36 Ga. App. 263 (136 S. E. 799), the petition for certiorari in the instant case did not plainly and distinctly set forth the errors complained of; and such a petition not being amendable, it should have been dismissed upon the hearing, on the motion of the defendant in certiorari. See also Dean v. Johnson, 18 Ga. App. 661 (90 S. E. 286); Green v. Patterson, 25 Ga. App. 374, 375 (103 S. E. 437).

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southland Loan & Investment Co. v. Truelove, 138 S.E. 336, 36 Ga. App. 750, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 282 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

138 S.E. 336 (Southland Loan & Investment Co. v. Truelove) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dean v. Johnson
90 S.E. 286 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Green v. Patterson
103 S.E. 437 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
East River National Bank v. Ellman
136 S.E. 799 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)