Southland Loan & Investment Co. v. Patterson

158 S.E. 775, 43 Ga. App. 314, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 324
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 12, 1931·No. 21359·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Tlie allegation in the petition in this case that “the defendant company by and through its agent, credit manager, and representative, R. T. Leppert, made a false and malicious affidavit without probable cause,” etc., sufficiently alleges an act done by the defendant. Gilmer v. Allen, 9 Ga. 208 (4).

2. The petition in this case, alleging malice, want of probable cause, and that the proceedings complained of had terminated in favor of the defendant therein before suit for damages based upon such proceedings was brought, sets out an action for the malicious use of legal process. Fryer v. Morrison, 32 Ga. App. 312 (123 S. E. 40) ; McElreath v. Gross, 23 Ga. App. 287 (98 S. E. 190) ; Clement v. Orr, 4 Ga. App. 117, 118 (60 S. E. 1017); Mullins v. Matthews, 122 Ga. 286, 289 (50 S. E. 101) ; Williams v. Adelman, 41 Ga. App. 424 (153 S. E. 224).

3. In the light of the foregoing rulings, the trial judge did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Blood/worth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southland Loan & Investment Co. v. Patterson, 158 S.E. 775, 43 Ga. App. 314, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 324 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

158 S.E. 775 (Southland Loan & Investment Co. v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilmer v. Allen
9 Ga. 208 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1850)
Mullins v. Matthews
50 S.E. 101 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Clement v. Orr
60 S.E. 1017 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
McElreath v. Gross
98 S.E. 190 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Fryer v. Morrison
123 S.E. 40 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Williams v. Adelman
153 S.E. 224 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)