Southland Loan & Investment Co. v. Patterson
This text of 158 S.E. 775 (Southland Loan & Investment Co. v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Tlie allegation in the petition in this case that “the defendant company by and through its agent, credit manager, and representative, R. T. Leppert, made a false and malicious affidavit without probable cause,” etc., sufficiently alleges an act done by the defendant. Gilmer v. Allen, 9 Ga. 208 (4).
2. The petition in this case, alleging malice, want of probable cause, and that the proceedings complained of had terminated in favor of the defendant therein before suit for damages based upon such proceedings was brought, sets out an action for the malicious use of legal process. Fryer v. Morrison, 32 Ga. App. 312 (123 S. E. 40) ; McElreath v. Gross, 23 Ga. App. 287 (98 S. E. 190) ; Clement v. Orr, 4 Ga. App. 117, 118 (60 S. E. 1017); Mullins v. Matthews, 122 Ga. 286, 289 (50 S. E. 101) ; Williams v. Adelman, 41 Ga. App. 424 (153 S. E. 224).
3. In the light of the foregoing rulings, the trial judge did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 S.E. 775, 43 Ga. App. 314, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southland-loan-investment-co-v-patterson-gactapp-1931.