Southers v. City of Farmington

Missouri Court of Appeals

Southers v. City of Farmington

402 S.W.3d 161, 2013 WL 3229699, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 767

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 25, 2013·No. No. ED 98787·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s entry of judgment in accord with the jury verdict in defendant’s favor. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s entry of judgment in accord with the jury verdict in defendant’s favor. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Southers v. City of Farmington, 402 S.W.3d 161, 2013 WL 3229699, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 767 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

402 S.W.3d 161 (Southers v. City of Farmington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.