Southern v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Southern v. State

201 So. 3d 1292, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16209

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 2016·No. No. 1D13-4026·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

By its order dated September 21, 2016, the Florida Supreme Court, citing Falcon v. State, 162 So.3d 954 (Fla.2015) and Landrum v. State, 192 So.3d 459 (Fla. 2016), instructed this court to remand Appellant’s case “for resentencing in conformance with chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida, which has been codified in sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402 of the Florida Statutes.” In accordance with that order, we withdraw our previously entered opinion and mandate and REMAND for resentencing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

■ ROWE, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

By its order dated September 21, 2016, the Florida Supreme Court, citing Falcon v. State, 162 So.3d 954 (Fla.2015) and Landrum v. State, 192 So.3d 459 (Fla. 2016), instructed this court to remand Appellant’s case “for resentencing in conformance with chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida, which has been codified in sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402 of the Florida Statutes.” In accordance with that order, we withdraw our previously entered opinion and mandate and REMAND for resentencing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

■ ROWE, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Southern v. State, 201 So. 3d 1292, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16209 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

201 So. 3d 1292 (Southern v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related