Southern Theatres Corp. v. Martin
This text of 5 S.E.2d 39 (Southern Theatres Corp. v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. This case falls within the general rule that the writ of injunction will not be issued to restrain a criminal prosecution. The court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition as amended. Asa G. Candler Inc. v. Atlanta, 178 Ga. 661 (174 S. E. 129); Sosebee v. Demorest, 182 Ga. 338 (185 S. E. 330); Chivilis v. West, 182 Ga. 379 (185 S. E. 348); Hornsby v. Bristow, 185 Ga. 577 (196 S. E. 25); Walnut Transfer & Storage Co. v. Harrison, 185 Ga. 720 (196 S. E. 432); Brimer v. Jones, 185 Ga. 747 (196 S. E. 435); Jewel Tea Co. v. Cartersville, 185 Ga. 799 (196 S. E. 712).
2. In view of recitals in the order sustaining the demurrer and in the bill of exceptions, the case must be treated as one in which the demurrer to the original petition was renewed after the amendments.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 S.E.2d 39, 188 Ga. 852, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-theatres-corp-v-martin-ga-1939.