Southern Surety Co. v. Elliott

161 S.E. 679, 44 Ga. App. 376, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 733
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1931
Docket21874
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 161 S.E. 679 (Southern Surety Co. v. Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Surety Co. v. Elliott, 161 S.E. 679, 44 Ga. App. 376, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 733 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Luke, J.

In a proceeding pending before the Industrial Commission of Georgia, instituted by H. M. Elliott against Sims & Clonts, employers, and Southern Surety Company of New York, insurer, an order was taken by the full commission on June 20, 1931, as follows: “ . . This case came before the full commission on June 22, 1931, upon application of the employee for a review of the award of Commissioner Stanley made on May 28, 1931. The employee also petitioned for the introduction of further evidence which is essential to the proper adjudication of the claim,'and this petition is granted. This case will be remanded to a single commissioner for further hearing, and the parties at interest notified when the case is set for hearing.” The Industrial Commission allowed an application for appeal to the superior court from this order. That court affirmed the order appealed from; and to this judgment the employers and the insurer excepted.

After due consideration, this court is clearly of the opinion that the order of the commission involved here is not in the nature of such a final "award,” "order,” “judgment,” or "decision” as is contemplated by section 59 of the workmen’s compensation act, providing for appeals to the superior courts from decisions of the Industrial Commission. Since, in our view, the appeal to the superior court was [377]*377improvideutly allowed by the Industrial Commission, no harmful error was committed by the superior court in the premises.

Let the writ of error be dismissed with costs.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, O. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farist v. Blue Ridge Carpet Mills
291 S.E.2d 741 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Garner v. Owens-Illinois Glass Container
216 S.E.2d 709 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Ocean Accident & Guaranty Co. v. Hulsey
131 S.E.2d 806 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Chastain v. SPARTAN MILLS
88 S.E.2d 836 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1955)
King v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
187 S.E. 888 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.E. 679, 44 Ga. App. 376, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-surety-co-v-elliott-gactapp-1931.