Southern Steamship Co. v. Sparks

22 Tex. 657
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1859·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Wheeler, Ch. J.

It cannot be doubted, that a wharfinger, no less than a common carrier, (1 Parsons on Contracts, 649,) may make what contract he pleases, as. to his compensation. If a tavern keeper, warehouseman, or wharfinger, specifies his rates of charges, and gives notice to a customer in advance, and the latter afterwards puts up at his tavern, or makes use of his warehouse or wharf, he thereby assents to the proposed charges, and cannot refuse to pay them, upon the ground that they are more than is reasonable or customary. By the use of the wharf, after notice of the plaintiff’s rates of charges, the defendants impliedly contracted to pay them, and they cannot now disaffirm their contract. There is no error in the judgment, and it is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Steamship Co. v. Sparks, 22 Tex. 657 (Tex. 1859).

22 Tex. 657 (Southern Steamship Co. v. Sparks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bagdad Land & Lumber Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
172 So. 851 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
The M. L. C. No. 10
10 F.2d 699 (Second Circuit, 1926)
County of Anderson v. Kennedy
58 Tex. 616 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)