Southern Specialty Co. v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Southern Specialty Co. v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co.

135 So. 856, 102 Fla. 462

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 11, 1931·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seem to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Terrell, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seem to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Terrell, J.J., concur.

Southern Specialty Co. v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co., 135 So. 856, 102 Fla. 462 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

135 So. 856 (Southern Specialty Co. v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.