Southern Service Co. v. County of Los Angeles
310 U.S. 610, 60 S. Ct. 979
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Graham & Foster v. Goodcell, 282 U. S. 409, 429-430; Eitel v. Toman, 308 U. S. 505; Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Toman, 308 U. S. 505. (2) Ohio Oil Co. v. Conway, 281 U. S. 146, 159; Railroad Co. v. Commissioners, 98 U. S. 541, 543-544; Chesebrough v. United States, 192 U. S. 253, 259-260.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southern Service Co. v. County of Los Angeles, 310 U.S. 610, 60 S. Ct. 979 (1940).
310 U.S. 610 (Southern Service Co. v. County of Los Angeles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reynolds v. City & County of San Francisco
53 Cal. App. 3d 99 (California Court of Appeal, 1975)
Trust Co. Of Chicago v. Pennsylvania R. Co
183 F.2d 640 (Seventh Circuit, 1950)