Southern Ry. Co. v. Robertson

230 F. 1023, 144 C.C.A. 664, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1530
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 27, 1916
DocketNo. 2835
StatusPublished

This text of 230 F. 1023 (Southern Ry. Co. v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Ry. Co. v. Robertson, 230 F. 1023, 144 C.C.A. 664, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1530 (5th Cir. 1916).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the transcript in the light of the briefs of counsel satisfies us that there Is no reversible error in any of the rulings complained of, that the evidence supports the finding that the plaintiff in erx-or was guilty of negligence, and that the defendant in error did wot contribute to her own injury. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 F. 1023, 144 C.C.A. 664, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-ry-co-v-robertson-ca5-1916.