Southern Ry. Co. v. Moore

Supreme Court

Southern Ry. Co. v. Moore

284 U.S. 581, 52 S. Ct. 38

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 2, 1931·No. No. 45·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The judgment herein is reversed, upon the ground, as matter of law, that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain a finding that negligence of the petitioner was the cause of the death of respondent’s intestate.' Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Coogan, 271 [582] U. S. 472, 474, 478; Atlantic Coast Line v. Driggers, 279 U. S. 787, 788; Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Toops, 281 U. S. 351, 354-355.

Messrs. S. R. Prince, H. O’B. Cooper, Frank G. Tompkins, and L. E. Jeffries were on the brief for petitioner. Mr. Wm. C. Wolfe was on the brief for respondent. See 161 S. E. 525.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The judgment herein is reversed, upon the ground, as matter of law, that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain a finding that negligence of the petitioner was the cause of the death of respondent’s intestate.' Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Coogan, 271 [582] U. S. 472, 474, 478; Atlantic Coast Line v. Driggers, 279 U. S. 787, 788; Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Toops, 281 U. S. 351, 354-355.

Messrs. S. R. Prince, H. O’B. Cooper, Frank G. Tompkins, and L. E. Jeffries were on the brief for petitioner. Mr. Wm. C. Wolfe was on the brief for respondent. See 161 S. E. 525.

Southern Ry. Co. v. Moore, 284 U.S. 581, 52 S. Ct. 38 (1931).

Pincite

284 U.S. 581 (Southern Ry. Co. v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related