Southern Ry. Co. v. Lawrence

67 F.2d 426, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 4492
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 7, 1933
DocketNo. 6981
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 F.2d 426 (Southern Ry. Co. v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Ry. Co. v. Lawrence, 67 F.2d 426, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 4492 (5th Cir. 1933).

Opinion

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

This case was argued with, and is controlled by, that of Southern Railway Co. v. Wilbanks (C. C. A.) 67 F.(2d) 424, just decided. Daisy Lawrence recovered for the homicide of her husband, who was sitting by the side of Wilbanks when the truck was struck by the train. The only assignment of error relates to the refusal to direct a verdict for the railway company. Mrs. Lawrence could recover only in case her husband could if he had survived. The negligence of Wilbanks is not imputable 'to Lawrence. Lawrence certainly was no more blameworthy than Wilbanks. What was said of the case of Wilbanks applies to tMs.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlantic Greyhound Corp. v. Loudermilk
110 F.2d 596 (Fifth Circuit, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 F.2d 426, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 4492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-ry-co-v-lawrence-ca5-1933.