Southern Railway System v. Auto Rent, Inc.
264 F.2d 247
Opinion
This appeal by the carrier, Southern Railway System, has been heard and considered on the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys for the contending parties and upon the record in the case;
And it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no reversible error inheres in the rulings of the trial judge or in the procedure in the case;
The judgment entered on the verdict of the jury is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southern Railway System v. Auto Rent, Inc., 264 F.2d 247 (6th Cir. 1959).
264 F.2d 247 (Southern Railway System v. Auto Rent, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States Steel Corporation, of the Steamer Elbert H. Gary v. Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Company, a Michigan Corporation, Etc., Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Company, a Michigan Corporation, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. United States Steel Corporation, of the Steamer Elbert H. Gary, Cross-Appellee
264 F.2d 247 (Sixth Circuit, 1959)