Southern Railway Co. v. Watts
261 U.S. 609, 43 S. Ct. 518, 67 L. Ed. 825, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2607
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Southern Railway Co. v. Watts. Read the opinion of the Court — 260 U.S. 519 →
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 9, 1923·No. No. 756; No. 724; No. 744; No. 727·Published
Opinion
The motion to substitute the new Commissioner of Revenue, R. A. Daughton, for the ex-Commissioner of Revenue, A. D. Watts, is granted, on the ground that such substitution is authorized by § 461, Consol. Stats. N. Car. 1919, as construed by the Supreme Court of North Carolina in Davenport v. McKee, 98 N. Car. 500.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southern Railway Co. v. Watts, 261 U.S. 609, 43 S. Ct. 518, 67 L. Ed. 825, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2607 (1923).
261 U.S. 609 (Southern Railway Co. v. Watts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.