Southern Railway Co. v. Sommer
This text of 37 S.E. 735 (Southern Railway Co. v. Sommer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Nothing coming from a juror, either directly or indirectly, in the way of a narrative with respect to the manner in which a verdict was arrived at, will be heard to impeach the same.
2. While portions of the charge required qualification in order to render them abstractly correct, yet, as the entire charge so fully and fairly presented the real issues in controversy as to leave no reasonable ground for apprehending that the jury did not understand the law of the case, the omission to make such qualification does not require a new trial.
3. The evidence, though decidedly conflicting, warranted the verdict, and the newly discovered evidence was not of such a character as to justify this court in setting aside the verdict after its approval by the trial judge.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 S.E. 735, 112 Ga. 512, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-sommer-ga-1900.