Southern Railway Co. v. Ray

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Southern Railway Co. v. Ray

118 S.E. 411, 30 Ga. App. 376, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 480

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Southern Railway Co. v. Ray. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Ga. App. 792 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 25, 1923·No. 12825·Published

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

It appearing from the remittitur and the opinion of the Supreme Court that the judgment of this court rendered in this case (28 Ga. App. 792, 13 S. E. 590) has been reversed, the judgment of this court is vacated, and, in accordance with the ruling of the Supremo [377]*377Court, the judgment of the court below is reversed because the court erred in denying a new trial. Southern Ry. Co. v. Ray, 155 Ga. 579 (118 S. E. 53). Judgment reversed.

Decided June 25, 1923. Boykin & Boykin, Maddox, McCamy & Shumate, for plaintiff in error. Thomas J. Lewis, Willis Smith, contra. Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, P. J.

It appearing from the remittitur and the opinion of the Supreme Court that the judgment of this court rendered in this case (28 Ga. App. 792, 13 S. E. 590) has been reversed, the judgment of this court is vacated, and, in accordance with the ruling of the Supremo [377]*377Court, the judgment of the court below is reversed because the court erred in denying a new trial. Southern Ry. Co. v. Ray, 155 Ga. 579 (118 S. E. 53). Judgment reversed.

Decided June 25, 1923. Boykin & Boykin, Maddox, McCamy & Shumate, for plaintiff in error. Thomas J. Lewis, Willis Smith, contra. Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Southern Railway Co. v. Ray, 118 S.E. 411, 30 Ga. App. 376, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 480 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

118 S.E. 411 (Southern Railway Co. v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related