Southern Railway Co. v. Pulliam

34 S.E. 147, 108 Ga. 808, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 455
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 27, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 34 S.E. 147 (Southern Railway Co. v. Pulliam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Railway Co. v. Pulliam, 34 S.E. 147, 108 Ga. 808, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 455 (Ga. 1899).

Opinion

Cobb, J.

1. The evidence claimed to have been newly discovered being cumulative on points directly under investigation at the trial, as well as impeaching, and being such as could have been easily discovered by the exercise of the very slightest diligence, it was not of such a character as to authorize the granting of a new trial.

2. No error of law was complained of. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

AU the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. Kendrick
80 S.E.2d 201 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Greer & Co. v. Raney
47 S.E. 939 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 S.E. 147, 108 Ga. 808, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-pulliam-ga-1899.