Southern Railway Co. v. Pulliam
34 S.E. 147, 108 Ga. 808, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 455
Opinion
1. The evidence claimed to have been newly discovered being cumulative on points directly under investigation at the trial, as well as impeaching, and being such as could have been easily discovered by the exercise of the very slightest diligence, it was not of such a character as to authorize the granting of a new trial.
2. No error of law was complained of. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southern Railway Co. v. Pulliam, 34 S.E. 147, 108 Ga. 808, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 455 (Ga. 1899).
34 S.E. 147 (Southern Railway Co. v. Pulliam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Young v. Kendrick
80 S.E.2d 201 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Greer & Co. v. Raney
47 S.E. 939 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)