Southern Railway Co. v. Powell

33 S.E. 951, 108 Ga. 791, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 422
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 20, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 S.E. 951 (Southern Railway Co. v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Railway Co. v. Powell, 33 S.E. 951, 108 Ga. 791, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 422 (Ga. 1899).

Opinion

Little, J.

1. A charge the effect of which was to instruct a jury that it was an open question for their determination whether or not, upon a given state of facts, a railroad company had exercised due diligence, was erroneous whjn, upon that state of facts, it was manifest, as matter of law, that the company had exercised due diligence.

2. The evidence showed that the plaintiff’s mule was killed by the running of the defendant’s train, and thereupon the legal presumption arose that the defendant was negligent; but as this presumption was fully and completely rebutted by uncontradicted evidence, the verdict was wholly unwarranted, and therefore contrary to law.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barbre v. Scott
43 S.E.2d 760 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 S.E. 951, 108 Ga. 791, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-powell-ga-1899.