Southern Railway Co. v. Pool
This text of 34 S.E. 141 (Southern Railway Co. v. Pool) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed.
When a horse in a city, town, or village is quietly grazing on an unused street between the railroad-track and a barbed-wire fence near by, in plain view of the employees of the railroad company having control of an approaching train, the company is liable to the owner of the animal for injuries it sustains in consequence of being frightened by the wanton, unnecessary, and unusual blowing of the locomotive whistle which causes the animal to become injured by running into the fence. There was evidence to sustain this theory of the plaintiff’s case, and the court therefore did not err in overruling defendant’s petition for certiorari on the ground that the verdict of the jury in the justice’s court was contrary to evidence. Georgia Railroad v. Carr. 73 Ga. 558; Morgan v. Central Railroad, 77 Ga. 788, 792; Atlanta & W. P. R. Co. v. Hudson, 62 Ga. 680.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 S.E. 141, 108 Ga. 808, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-pool-ga-1899.