Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Southern Railway Co. v. Payne

Southern Railway Co. v. Payne

75 S.E. 816, 11 Ga. App. 477, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 61
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 24, 1912
Docket3172
StatusPublished

This text of 75 S.E. 816 (Southern Railway Co. v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Railway Co. v. Payne, 75 S.E. 816, 11 Ga. App. 477, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 61 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Russell, J.

The Supreme Court having held, in response to questions certified to it by this court (Southern Railway Co. v. Payne, 138 Ga. 18, 74 S. E. 697), that section 381 of the Civil Code (1910) is not unconstitutional for the reason that it is repugnant to article 6, section 8, paragraph 1, pf the constitution (Civil Code, § 6526), and having further held that the commissioned notary public of a militia district which has been abolished may continue to discharge the functions of his office until the term for which he was appointed has expired, the affidavit of illegality in the present case was properly dismissed.

Judgment affirmed.

Pottle, J., not presiding. George A. H. Harris & Son, for plaintiff in error. O. I. Carey, Ennis & Shaw, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southern Railway Co. v. Payne
74 S.E. 697 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 S.E. 816, 11 Ga. App. 477, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-payne-gactapp-1912.