Southern Railway Co. v. North State Cotton Co.

64 So. 965, 107 Miss. 71
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 64 So. 965 (Southern Railway Co. v. North State Cotton Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Railway Co. v. North State Cotton Co., 64 So. 965, 107 Miss. 71 (Mich. 1914).

Opinion

Cook, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The facts of this case are, in all essential particulars, identical with the facts in St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Woodruff Mills, 62 So. 171. This case, as well as the case cited, is controlled' by the Carmack amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act, and the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States construing same. Section 4851, Code 1906, does not apply to interstate shipments, and the trial court erred in holding the contrary.

It follows that the judgment of the circuit court will be reversed, and judgment will be entered here for appellant, defendant below.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Mills
62 So. 171 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 So. 965, 107 Miss. 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-north-state-cotton-co-miss-1914.