Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina

373 U.S. 907, 83 S. Ct. 1296
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 13, 1963
DocketNo. 823; No. 943
StatusPublished

This text of 373 U.S. 907 (Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina, 373 U.S. 907, 83 S. Ct. 1296 (1963).

Opinion

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Probable [908]*908jurisdiction noted. The cases are consolidated and a total of two hours is allotted for oral argument.

William T. Joyner and Earl E.Eisenhart, Jr. for appellant in No. 823. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States et al. in No. 943.

Reported below: 210 F. Supp. 675.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of North Carolina v. United States
210 F. Supp. 675 (M.D. North Carolina, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
373 U.S. 907, 83 S. Ct. 1296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-north-carolina-scotus-1963.