Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina

Supreme Court

Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina

373 U.S. 907, 83 S. Ct. 1296

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina. Read the opinion of the Court — 376 U.S. 93 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 13, 1963·No. No. 823; No. 943·Published

Opinion

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Probable [908]*908jurisdiction noted. The cases are consolidated and a total of two hours is allotted for oral argument.

William T. Joyner and Earl E.Eisenhart, Jr. for appellant in No. 823. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States et al. in No. 943.

Reported below: 210 F. Supp. 675.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Probable [908]*908jurisdiction noted. The cases are consolidated and a total of two hours is allotted for oral argument.

William T. Joyner and Earl E.Eisenhart, Jr. for appellant in No. 823. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States et al. in No. 943.

Reported below: 210 F. Supp. 675.

Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina, 373 U.S. 907, 83 S. Ct. 1296 (1963).

Pincite

373 U.S. 907 (Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related