Southern Railway Co. v. Morgan
This text of 85 S.E. 933 (Southern Railway Co. v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Under the ruling of this court in Georgia, Florida & Alabama R. Co. v. Elliott, 3 Ga. App. 773 (2), 775 (60 S. E. 363), the consignee is not required to tender the amount due the carrier for freight charges in advance of a demand that a “solid” car be so placed as to make its unloading practicable; and under the ruling in Southern Express Company v. Briggs, 1 Ga. App. 294 (4), 301 (57 S. E. 1066), a failure to deliver a shipment promptly and when the shipment is needed, or the postponement of delivery until the necessity for its use has passed, will support an action for the conversion of the property, and a recovery' of the value of the property thus held by the carrier, as damages.
2. The errors in the chai-ge, and in the refusal of the instructions requested, in the light of the whole record, were not of sufficient materiality to have required the grant of a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 S.E. 933, 16 Ga. App. 617, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-morgan-gactapp-1915.