Southern Railway Co. v. Meers

128 S.E. 437, 34 Ga. App. 125, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 62
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 9, 1925
Docket16144
StatusPublished

This text of 128 S.E. 437 (Southern Railway Co. v. Meers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Railway Co. v. Meers, 128 S.E. 437, 34 Ga. App. 125, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 62 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

None of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial shows reversible error. There is some evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Luke, J., dissents. Maddox, Maddox & Mitchell, for plaintiff in error. William E. & Gordon Mann', contra!

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 S.E. 437, 34 Ga. App. 125, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-meers-gactapp-1925.