Southern Railway Co. v. Lasseter

Supreme Court of Georgia

Southern Railway Co. v. Lasseter

42 S.E. 41, 115 Ga. 689, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 533

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 9, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pish, J.

As the verdict in the magistrate’s court was limited, in amount to the • proved value of the plaintiff’s trunk which was destroyed, and the evidence was amply sufficient to establish the liability of the defendant, its petition for certiorari, alleging to the contrary, was wholly without merit. The judgment of the superior court was, therefore, so palpably correct, it must be held that the bill of exceptions was sued out for delay only, and accordingly the judgment is

Affirmed, with damages.

All concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pish, J.

As the verdict in the magistrate’s court was limited, in amount to the • proved value of the plaintiff’s trunk which was destroyed, and the evidence was amply sufficient to establish the liability of the defendant, its petition for certiorari, alleging to the contrary, was wholly without merit. The judgment of the superior court was, therefore, so palpably correct, it must be held that the bill of exceptions was sued out for delay only, and accordingly the judgment is

Affirmed, with damages.

All concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Southern Railway Co. v. Lasseter, 42 S.E. 41, 115 Ga. 689, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 533 (Ga. 1902).

Pincite

42 S.E. 41 (Southern Railway Co. v. Lasseter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related