Southern Railway Co. v. Lang
74 S.E. 443, 11 Ga. App. 8, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 227
Opinion
1. The petition as amended was not subject to the demurrer.
2. There was some evidence from which the jury could find that the servants of the defendant in charge of its engine could have seen the plaintiff’s cow in time to have stopped the train before striking the animal; and there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southern Railway Co. v. Lang, 74 S.E. 443, 11 Ga. App. 8, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 227 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
74 S.E. 443 (Southern Railway Co. v. Lang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Wilson
91 S.E.2d 71 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
GA. SOUTHERN &C. RY. CO. v. Wilson
91 S.E.2d 71 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Grace
166 S.E. 684 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Willis
157 S.E. 254 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Southern Railway Co. v. Rundle
139 S.E. 830 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Georgia Coast & Piedmont Railroad v. Smith
95 S.E. 1017 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Smith v. State
78 S.E. 134 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)