Southern Railway Co. v. James
39 S.E. 849, 114 Ga. 198, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 636
Opinion
Whether a case will be reinstated after nonsuit is a matter within, the discretion of the trial judge, and, where he reinstates the case, his-discretion will not be interfered with unless manifestly abused. Central R., Co. v. Folds, 86 Ga. 42.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southern Railway Co. v. James, 39 S.E. 849, 114 Ga. 198, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 636 (Ga. 1901).
39 S.E. 849 (Southern Railway Co. v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kinney v. Miller
150 S.E.2d 723 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Coker v. Kent
149 S.E.2d 665 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)
Bell v. Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
130 S.E.2d 615 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Horne v. Phillips
91 S.E.2d 203 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Butler v. Hazelrigs
54 S.E.2d 266 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Nelms v. Venable
33 S.E.2d 418 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Adams v. Seay
9 S.E.2d 117 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Walker v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
170 S.E. 258 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Brooks v. Brooks
165 S.E. 106 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Jones v. Pacific Fire Insurance
125 S.E. 470 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Glenn v. Glenn
111 S.E. 378 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Buchanan v. James
68 S.E. 72 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
City of Atlanta v. Miller
54 S.E. 538 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)