Southern Railway Co. v. Jackson
This text of 91 S.E. 28 (Southern Railway Co. v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. If a woman exercising ordinary care in walking across a railroad-track at a street-crossing in a city, attended by her two small children, discovers that she is about to be run down by an engine approaching the crossing in a grossly negligent manner, and leaps from ’■'lie track and falls to the ground, and one of her..ehildmnMs--FTnrttWn and mangled by the .engine in her presence, and the woman on account o the fall su§|aw4lñ^isEock^ and_ endures__pain_.and suffering therefrí-n. o^e has a right of action .for thejffirong to. herself. The petition was subject to general demurrer.
2. But if - the woman, having_.srossed the railroad track, did not leap and fall or .sustain any personal jnjury, the fact that she_.witnessed the mangling the child "and became frightened and suffered a severe nervous shock “therefrom, would nfit_ entitle her to a recovery. Goddard v. Watters, 14 Ga. App. 722 (82 S. E. 304); Sanderson v. Nor. Pac. Ry. Co., 88 Minn. 162 (92 N. W. 542, 60 L. R. A. 403, 97 Am. St. R. 509); Huston v. Freemansburg, 212 Pa. 548 (61 Atl. 1022, 3 L. R. A. (N. S.) 49, [244]*24468); C. & O. R. Co. v. Robinett, 151 Ky. 778 (152 S. W. 976, 45 L. R. A. (N. S.) 433, 445) ; Conley v. United Drug Co., 218 Mass. 238 (105 N. E. 975, L R. A. 1915D, 830, 833). See also Sappington v. A. & W. P. R. Co., 127 Ga. 178 (56 S. E. 311).
(а) Applying the foregoing principles to the uncontradicted evidence, a verdict for Em plaintif^s^sjnauthorized.
(б) Certain portions of the charge upon which error was assigned were contrary to the ralings herein announced; and the judge also erred in refusing certain requests to charge which properly embodied the principles stated. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E. 28, 146 Ga. 243, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-jackson-ga-1916.