Southern Railway Co. v. Irwin
94 S.E. 838, 21 Ga. App. 535, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 391
Opinion
The petition was not subject to the demurrers interposed. Hudson v. Hudson, 119 Ga. 637 (46 S. E. 874); Petty v. Atlantic & Birmingham Air-Line Railway Co., 132 Ga. 153 (63 S. E. 817). The motion for a new trial was based on the general grounds only, and there was evidence to authorize the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. It was not error to overrule the motion for a n«w trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southern Railway Co. v. Irwin, 94 S.E. 838, 21 Ga. App. 535, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 391 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).
94 S.E. 838 (Southern Railway Co. v. Irwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hudson v. Hudson
46 S.E. 874 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Petty v. Atlantic & Birmingham Air-Line Railway Co.
63 S.E. 817 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)