Southern Railway Co. v. Irwin

94 S.E. 838, 21 Ga. App. 535, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 391
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 21, 1918
Docket8504
StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 838 (Southern Railway Co. v. Irwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Railway Co. v. Irwin, 94 S.E. 838, 21 Ga. App. 535, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 391 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The petition was not subject to the demurrers interposed. Hudson v. Hudson, 119 Ga. 637 (46 S. E. 874); Petty v. Atlantic & Birmingham Air-Line Railway Co., 132 Ga. 153 (63 S. E. 817). The motion for a new trial was based on the general grounds only, and there was evidence to authorize the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. It was not error to overrule the motion for a n«w trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenlcins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hudson v. Hudson
46 S.E. 874 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Petty v. Atlantic & Birmingham Air-Line Railway Co.
63 S.E. 817 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 838, 21 Ga. App. 535, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-irwin-gactapp-1918.