Southern Railway Co. v. Irwin
This text of 94 S.E. 838 (Southern Railway Co. v. Irwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition was not subject to the demurrers interposed. Hudson v. Hudson, 119 Ga. 637 (46 S. E. 874); Petty v. Atlantic & Birmingham Air-Line Railway Co., 132 Ga. 153 (63 S. E. 817). The motion for a new trial was based on the general grounds only, and there was evidence to authorize the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. It was not error to overrule the motion for a n«w trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 S.E. 838, 21 Ga. App. 535, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-irwin-gactapp-1918.