Southern Railway Co. v. Hunter

74 Miss. 444
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1896·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Whitfield, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It very clearly appears from the testimony of Gresham himself that he did have a duty to perform for the master in regard to trespassers found on the train, to wit: “To carry them to the conductor, ’ ’ and if the conductor told him to put them off, “to pull the engineer down, stop the train, and put them off. ” This fact, under the plaintiff’s testimony as to what occurred, clearly distinguishes this case from the cases of Railroad Co. v. Latham, 72 Miss., 32, and Williams v. Railroad Co., 19 So. Rep., 90.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Railway Co. v. Hunter, 74 Miss. 444 (Mich. 1896).

74 Miss. 444 (Southern Railway Co. v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gulf, Mobile & Northern R. v. Weldy
14 So. 2d 340 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1943)
Jefferson v. Yazoo & M. v. R. R.
11 So. 2d 442 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1943)
Loper v. Yazoo M.V.R. Co.
145 So. 743 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1933)
Winn v. Kansas City Belt Railway Co.
151 S.W. 98 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1912)