Southern Railway Co. v. Hodgson Bros.

98 S.E. 541, 148 Ga. 851, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 83
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 24, 1919
DocketNo. 860
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 98 S.E. 541 (Southern Railway Co. v. Hodgson Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Railway Co. v. Hodgson Bros., 98 S.E. 541, 148 Ga. 851, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 83 (Ga. 1919).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

Hodgson Brothers Company sued out an attachment against Harris Brothers Grain Company, a non-resident of the State. The" attachment was levied by process of garnishment served upon the Southern Bailway Company. The garnishee answered not indebted, and that it had no property in its hands belonging to the defendant, etc.; and a traverse of the answer was duly filed. A judgment was rendered in the attachment suit in favor of the plaintiff; which was not excepted to. The garnishment case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, as follows: “In June, 1915, the Fort Worth & Bio Grande Bailway Company received from the Harris Brothers Grain Company, at Bochelle, Texas, certain sacks of oats consigned to Harris Brothers Grain [853]*853Company, Greenville, S. C., with instructions from the shippers to notify Hodgson Brothers Company at Athens, Georgia, upon the arrival of the car at Greenville, S. C. A bill of lading was issued with draft attached, drawn hy Harris Brothers Grain Company-for $559.30, with instruction that the paid freight bill was to be deducted from this amount and accepted as cash.’ This shipment of oats was received by the Southern Bailway Company from its connecting carrier, and by it transported to Greenville, S. C., where it arrived on or about July 10th, 1915. In the meanwhile Hodgson Brothers Company had transferred the invoice covering the shipment to the Acme Feed Company of Greenville, S. C., and upon the order of Hodgson Brothers Company (Harris Brothers Grain Company having notified the Southern Bailway Company, on June 15th, 1915, that the car of oats was for Hodgson Brothers Company of Athens)' it was delivered by the Southern Bailway Company to the Acme Feed Company on July 10th, 1915, upon that company paying to the Southern Bailway Company $559.30, $240.40 of which was the freight charges to which the Southern Bailway Company was entitled; thus leaving a balance in the hands of the Southern Bailway Company of $318.90. After the car of oats had been delivered as above set forth, the Southern Bailway Company received, on or about July 16th, 1915, another order from Harris Brothers Grain Company, dated July 14th, 1915, instructing the railway company to deliver the car of oats to A. M. Hayes of Greenville, S. C.; but at that time the ear had already been delivered to the Acme Feed Company, as above set forth. After summons of garnishment was served on July 14th, 1915, on the Southern Bailway Company, the defendant, Harris Brothers Grain Company, brought suit against the initial carrier, the Fort Worth & Bio Grande Bailway Company, in the county court of Dallas County, Texas, on account of the alleged wrongful delivery of this ear.of oats; and on February 17, 1916, a- judgment was obtained against the Fort Worth & Bio Grande Bailway Company for $399.10, the Southern Bailway Company’s plea of privilege having been sustained by the Texas court, and the suit as to it having been dismissed.” The answer of the garnishee stated, among other things, that the oats were delivered to the Acme Feed Company “upon the order of Harris Brothers Grain Company, the consignor.” There was no evidence as to indorse[854]*854ment or transfer of the bill of lading. A judgment was rendered .against the garnishee, and it carried the case to the Court of Appeals by writ of error. The judgment of the trial court was there affirmed, and a writ of certiorari to that judgment was granted by this court.

Applying to the foregoing facts the rulings stated in the head-notes, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause remanded. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crawford v. Crump
476 S.E.2d 855 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Milton Inn, Inc. v. Spiva
227 S.E.2d 525 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Goolsby v. Allstate Insurance
204 S.E.2d 789 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Anderson
130 S.E.2d 144 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
School Boy Sportwear Corp. v. Cornelia Garment Co.
126 S.E.2d 248 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Brenau College v. Mincey
61 S.E.2d 301 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Clarke
2 S.E.2d 608 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Curtis v. Bailey
179 S.E. 633 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Traylor v. Gormley
169 S.E. 850 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Reed Oil Co. v. Smith
114 S.E. 56 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Reed Oil Co. v. Smith
109 S.E. 171 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Southern Railway Co. v. Hodgson Bros.
99 S.E. 41 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 S.E. 541, 148 Ga. 851, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-hodgson-bros-ga-1919.