Southern Railway Co. v. Higgins
27 S.E. 785, 102 Ga. 586, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 632
Opinion
This being the first grant of a new.trial, the judgment'below will not be disturbed by this court; for, although the new trial was granted upon a special ground, it does not affirmatively appear that the law and the facts necessarily required the verdict which the jury rendered. Civil Code, 25585; Johnson v. Georgia R. R. Co., ante, 577.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southern Railway Co. v. Higgins, 27 S.E. 785, 102 Ga. 586, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 632 (Ga. 1897).
27 S.E. 785 (Southern Railway Co. v. Higgins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Telecable of Columbus, Inc.
232 S.E.2d 100 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Denney v. Tate
99 S.E.2d 296 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Bluestein v. Amason
174 S.E. 735 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Murray v. Davidson
162 S.E. 526 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)