Southern Railway Co. v. Grimes

Sixth Circuit

Southern Railway Co. v. Grimes

5 F.2d 1022, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2860

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 10, 1925

DocketNo. 4328

StatusPublished

This text of 5 F.2d 1022 (Southern Railway Co. v. Grimes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southern Railway Co. v. Grimes, 5 F.2d 1022, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2860 (6th Cir. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are not able to say that there was no evidence from which the jury had the right to infer that the engineer should, in the exercise of due care, have given some warning to McNabb. We observe that at what may have been a distance of 100 or 150 feet and over a time interval of two or three seconds it was necessarily apparent to the engineer that all the others of the section gang, including the one 3 feet from McNabb, had jumped back out of the way, but that McNabb continued to pay no attention and was apparently oblivious, and was therefore apparently in peril. While the time involved was very short, Mc-Nabb had to move only a few inches to be safe, and it may be that there was time enough for a whistle blast to “galvanize him into action.” The circumstances are unique. There is no controversy about the general legal rules. Applying them to these particular tacts, we cannot reverse the judgment on the sole ground now urged, and it is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are not able to say that there was no evidence from which the jury had the right to infer that the engineer should, in the exercise of due care, have given some warning to McNabb. We observe that at what may have been a distance of 100 or 150 feet and over a time interval of two or three seconds it was necessarily apparent to the engineer that all the others of the section gang, including the one 3 feet from McNabb, had jumped back out of the way, but that McNabb continued to pay no attention and was apparently oblivious, and was therefore apparently in peril. While the time involved was very short, Mc-Nabb had to move only a few inches to be safe, and it may be that there was time enough for a whistle blast to “galvanize him into action.” The circumstances are unique. There is no controversy about the general legal rules. Applying them to these particular tacts, we cannot reverse the judgment on the sole ground now urged, and it is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 F.2d 1022, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-grimes-ca6-1925.