Southern Railway Co. v. Gilmore
This text of 42 S.E. 220 (Southern Railway Co. v. Gilmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where the testimony of a witness relating to a particular matter is in part material and pertinent, though in part irrelevant, a general objection to the whole of this testimony is not well taken, since the inadmissible part should be distinctly pointed out and specific objection thereto-made. Maynard v. Association, 112 Ga. 443, 447, and cases cited ; and see Chambers v. Wesley, 113 Ga. 343.
2. The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to support a finding that the killing of some of the plaintiff’s stock was caused by the negligence of the defendant company; and the amount named in the verdict was not greater than the proved value of such stock.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 S.E. 220, 115 Ga. 890, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-gilmore-ga-1902.