Southern Railway Co. v. Fitzpatrick

70 So. 164, 195 Ala. 328, 1915 Ala. LEXIS 337
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 30, 1915·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

(1, 2) The majority are of the opinion that the trial court did not err in sustaining the plaintiff’s demurrer to the defendant’s special plea. The local act of 1901 (page 1970) authorized the trial of the cause in the precinct in which it was tried, and provided that this defendant could be sued in said precinct; and this local act has not been repealed by the Code. Nor are we impressed with the suggestion that said local act is unconstitutional.

The judgment of the law and equity court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Anderson, C. J., and McClellan, Sayre, Somerville, and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Railway Co. v. Fitzpatrick, 70 So. 164, 195 Ala. 328, 1915 Ala. LEXIS 337 (Ala. 1915).

70 So. 164 (Southern Railway Co. v. Fitzpatrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Skieff v. Cole-Skieff
884 So. 2d 880 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2003)
Ex Parte Kemp
168 So. 147 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1936)
Roberts v. Bright
133 So. 907 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)
Southern Railway Co. v. Goggins
73 So. 958 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)