Southern Railway Co. v. Fitzpatrick

Supreme Court of Alabama

Southern Railway Co. v. Fitzpatrick

70 So. 164, 195 Ala. 328, 1915 Ala. LEXIS 337

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 30, 1915

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 70 So. 164 (Southern Railway Co. v. Fitzpatrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southern Railway Co. v. Fitzpatrick, 70 So. 164, 195 Ala. 328, 1915 Ala. LEXIS 337 (Ala. 1915).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

(1, 2) The majority are of the opinion that the trial court did not err in sustaining the plaintiff’s demurrer to the defendant’s special plea. The local act of 1901 (page 1970) authorized the trial of the cause in the precinct in which it was tried, and provided that this defendant could be sued in said precinct; and this local act has not been repealed by the Code. Nor are we impressed with the suggestion that said local act is unconstitutional.

The judgment of the law and equity court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Anderson, C. J., and McClellan, Sayre, Somerville, and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI