Southern Railway Co. v. Edwards
70 S.E. 194, 9 Ga. App. 26, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 408
Opinion
The evidence offered by the defendant railroad company to rebut the legal presumption of negligence was itself contradicted, and the jury were authorized to infer from the facts in the ease that the killing of the mule might have been avoided by the exercise of ordinary diligence. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southern Railway Co. v. Edwards, 70 S.E. 194, 9 Ga. App. 26, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 408 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
70 S.E. 194 (Southern Railway Co. v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southern Railway Co. v. Freeman
198 S.E. 717 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Smith
82 S.E. 906 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)