Southern Railway Co. v. Dantzler

286 U.S. 318, 52 S. Ct. 520, 76 L. Ed. 1127, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 606
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 16, 1932·No. 787·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Roberts

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a companion case to No. 788, Southern Ry. Co. v. Youngblood, decided this day, ante, p. 313. The respondent’s intestate was the engineer of the train known as Extra 483 West. He had on his person after the accident his copy of the orders received at Branchville. The negligence claimed is practically the same as in No. 788, and none is alleged as against any member of the decedent’s crew or that of the train with which his engine collided. After the accident Dantzler was taken to a hospital, where before his death he stated to two persons that the accident was his fault — that he forgot his orders and ran past the point where he was directed to pass the other train.

*319 For the reasons given in the opinion in No. 788 the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Railway Co. v. Dantzler, 286 U.S. 318, 52 S. Ct. 520, 76 L. Ed. 1127, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 606 (1932).

286 U.S. 318 (Southern Railway Co. v. Dantzler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.
352 U.S. 521 (Supreme Court, 1957)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Anderson
38 S.E.2d 610 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Anderson
36 S.E.2d 435 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Southern Ry. Co. v. Woods
86 S.W.2d 903 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1935)
Tate v. Chicago, M.S.P. P.R. Co.
19 P.2d 137 (Washington Supreme Court, 1933)