Southern Railway Co. v. Crow
145 S.E. 672, 38 Ga. App. 734, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 419
Opinion
The evidence was in conflict, “but the issues were for the jury, and there being evidence to authorize their verdict, the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based upon the general grounds only.” Western & Atlantic Railroad Co. v. Barnett, 20 Ga. App. 616 (2) (93 S. E. 260); see Allen v. State, 37 Ga. App. 94 (139 S. E. 95); Perkins v. Attaway, 14 Ga. 28 (9).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Southern Railway Co. v. Crow, 145 S.E. 672, 38 Ga. App. 734, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 419 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).
145 S.E. 672 (Southern Railway Co. v. Crow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Barnett
93 S.E. 260 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Allen v. State
139 S.E. 95 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)