Southern Railway Co. v. Crow

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Southern Railway Co. v. Crow

145 S.E. 672, 38 Ga. App. 734, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 419

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 14, 1928

Docket19116

StatusPublished

This text of 145 S.E. 672 (Southern Railway Co. v. Crow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southern Railway Co. v. Crow, 145 S.E. 672, 38 Ga. App. 734, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 419 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodwortii, J.

The evidence was in conflict, “but the issues were for the jury, and there being evidence to authorize their verdict, the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based upon the general grounds only.” Western & Atlantic Railroad Co. v. Barnett, 20 Ga. App. 616 (2) (93 S. E. 260); see Allen v. State, 37 Ga. App. 94 (139 S. E. 95); Perkins v. Attaway, 14 Ga. 28 (9).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodwortii, J.

The evidence was in conflict, “but the issues were for the jury, and there being evidence to authorize their verdict, the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based upon the general grounds only.” Western & Atlantic Railroad Co. v. Barnett, 20 Ga. App. 616 (2) (93 S. E. 260); see Allen v. State, 37 Ga. App. 94 (139 S. E. 95); Perkins v. Attaway, 14 Ga. 28 (9).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 S.E. 672, 38 Ga. App. 734, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-crow-gactapp-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack