Southern Railway Co. v. Bowen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Southern Railway Co. v. Bowen

67 S.E. 936, 134 Ga. 376, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 209

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 18, 1910·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

There being no assignment of error on any question of law, ' and the evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the discretion of the trial judge in refusing to grant a new trial will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Action for damages. Before Judge ICimsey. Stephens superior court.

July 20, 1909. Fermor Barrett and A. G. & Julian McGurry, for plaintiff in error. Howard Thompson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

There being no assignment of error on any question of law, ' and the evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the discretion of the trial judge in refusing to grant a new trial will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Action for damages. Before Judge ICimsey. Stephens superior court.

July 20, 1909. Fermor Barrett and A. G. & Julian McGurry, for plaintiff in error. Howard Thompson, contra.

Southern Railway Co. v. Bowen, 67 S.E. 936, 134 Ga. 376, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 209 (Ga. 1910).

Pincite

67 S.E. 936 (Southern Railway Co. v. Bowen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related