Southern Railway Co. v. Bales

73 S.E. 846, 137 Ga. 567, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 89
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 15, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 S.E. 846 (Southern Railway Co. v. Bales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southern Railway Co. v. Bales, 73 S.E. 846, 137 Ga. 567, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 89 (Ga. 1912).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. The assignment of error upon the overruling of the demurrer to the petition is not referred to in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, and therefore it must be considered as abandoned.

2. So much of the charge as was excepted to was correct in the abstract and applicable to the evidence, and the criticisms upon it furnish no ground for a new trial.

3. Though conflicting, the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and the discretion of the trial judge in refusing a new trial will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoncur, except Bill, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tison v. Sword
95 S.E. 1017 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 S.E. 846, 137 Ga. 567, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southern-railway-co-v-bales-ga-1912.